comparative summary of the three algorithms – Greedy, Dynamic Programming (DP), and Divide & Conquer (D&C)






Algorithm Paradigms Comparison


Comparison of Algorithm Paradigms

1. Greedy Algorithm

  • Basic Concept: Makes locally optimal choices in the hope of finding a global optimum.
  • Classification: Optimization problems with greedy-choice property & optimal substructure.
  • Applications: Huffman Coding, Kruskal’s & Prim’s MST, Dijkstra’s shortest path, Activity selection.
  • Advantages: Simple, fast, easy to implement, efficient when applicable.
  • Disadvantages: Not always optimal, limited applicability, requires proof of greedy-choice property.

2. Dynamic Programming (DP)

  • Basic Concept: Breaks problems into overlapping subproblems, solves each once, and stores results.
  • Classification: Optimization problems with overlapping subproblems & optimal substructure.
  • Applications: Fibonacci, Knapsack, Matrix Chain Multiplication, LCS, Bellman-Ford.
  • Advantages: Guarantees optimal solution, reduces exponential to polynomial, efficient reuse of results.
  • Disadvantages: High memory, slower than greedy when greedy applies, needs careful formulation.

3. Divide and Conquer (D&C)

  • Basic Concept: Breaks a problem into smaller independent subproblems, solves recursively, and combines results.
  • Classification: Recursive paradigm with independent subproblems & merge step.
  • Applications: Merge Sort, Quick Sort, Binary Search, Strassen’s multiplication, Closest pair of points.
  • Advantages: Efficient (e.g. O(n log n)), recursive simplicity, parallelizable.
  • Disadvantages: Recursive overhead, extra space sometimes, not ideal if subproblems overlap (DP better).

Quick Comparative Table

Aspect Greedy Dynamic Programming Divide & Conquer
Concept Local optimal choice Store & reuse subproblems Split → Solve → Combine
Problem Type Optimization (special) Optimization (general) General recursive problems
Key Property Greedy-choice property Overlapping subproblems Independent subproblems
Applications MST, Dijkstra, Huffman Knapsack, LCS, Bellman-Ford Sorting, Search, Geometry
Advantages Fast, simple Optimal solution guaranteed Efficient, parallelizable
Disadvantages Not always optimal High memory/time sometimes Recursive overhead, extra space



apps-fileview.texmex_20250814.00_p1
Algorithms-comparison.html
Displaying Algorithms-comparison.html.

TECH TALENTS
Average rating:  
 0 reviews
Social Share Buttons and Icons powered by Ultimatelysocial
Scan the code